The following Argument has been submitted for the Viewpoint above.
wb_incandescent
It is a form of “Collective Punishment” which is strictly prohibited under International Law

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) strictly prohibits any form of collective punishment. Therefore, the United States is legally prohibited from implementing policies that diminish the well-being of millions of ordinary citizens, even if the underlying objectives are legitimate. Although the U.S. claims that its sanctions do not affect ordinary citizens, this claim does not align with the actual situation on the ground. It is impossible to drastically reduce a country's income (by some estimates, to a third of its original value) and comfortably assert that its ordinary citizens will not be affected.

The following Counters have been submitted for the Argument above.
error
"Collective Punishment" is extremely vague

The concept of collective punishment lacks a definitive explanation, as neither international treaties nor customary sources provide a clear definition of it (See the abstract in this article). If a country is oppressive, what should the world do, sit and watch? Since it’s not explicitly defined, the U.S. is doing its best to maintain order and justice in the world.

{{story_help_text}}
Placeholder image

{{r.time_ago}}
{{comment_help_text}}
Placeholder image

{{r.body}}
{{r.time_ago}}

Overview