Practical Tips for Making the Most of the Platform
  • Choose topics carefully. Try asking specific questions that touch upon areas where people's opinions truly differ. For instance, instead of broadly asking, Is Israel a bad player in the region?, consider more precise questions like, Is drawing a parallel between Hamas's attack on Oct. 7 and the slave revolts in the U.S. a valid comparison? This approach also connects to the idea of nested topics, which will be discussed next.
  • Use nested topics when necessary. Try organizing discussions better by using nested topics. For example, when addressing a complex issue such as abortion, it is beneficial to make references to related topics such as the existence of God. Nested topics help prevent any single page from becoming overloaded with excessive information.
  • Verify sources during evaluations. The platform primarily relies on users (or the wisdom of the crowd) to assess the authenticity of the information presented within arguments. When evaluating an argument, ensure to (i) verify whether any claims made within the argument requires external references, and (ii) if so, assess whether the argument submitter has adequately provided such references.
  • Cite sources used. Similarly, when submitting an argument or counter, always provide the sources of the information utilized. This practice helps reduce the risk of falling into cognitive biases and spreading misinformation.
  • Include one point per argument. Each submitted argument should focus on a single point. If you have multiple reasons supporting a viewpoint, submit them separately. This approach keeps the content more organized and streamlines the process of identifying top arguments, which is the platform's primary objective.
  • Include responses to common counters in your argument. Before submitting an argument, research the common counters to it. Write your argument so it isn't easily undermined by likely counters; otherwise, all your efforts may be in vain after the first one or two counters are submitted.
  • Prioritize easy-to-understand arguments. Do your best to develop clear and easy-to-understand arguments. Also, when evaluating arguments submitted by others, down-weight complex or convoluted ones. An argument isn't very helpful if it's difficult to understand. Additionally, convoluted and obfuscating arguments have the potential to include falsification.
  • Always use soft and scientific language. When developing an argument or counter, always use soft and scientific language. While it may initially require some self-restraint and effort, you'll soon recognize the significant positive impact it has on the overall user experience on the platform.

Overview