The following Argument has been submitted for the above Viewpoint.

wb_incandescent

Hamas has repeatedly shown it is approachable, but Israel does not want peace with them for political reasons

When Hamas came to power in 2006 after a fair election, as confirmed by the UN and US, they repeatedly sent peace feelers to the Israeli government. This implied they were seeking some form of settlement and peaceful coexistence with Israeli citizens. However, the Israeli government dismissed all these efforts. Although a ceasefire was later reached, it was soon broken unilaterally by Israel.

While it's true that Hamas at the time of sending peace feelers asked for the right of return for all refugees expelled from their homes in 1948—a demand not favored by Israel—one should note that, first, international law does recognize the right of return for expelled people, and second, Hamas presented it as a topic of negotiation, which Israel refused to engage in.

Israelis often accuse Palestinians of not wanting to peacefully coexist with them. However, factual events suggest otherwise.

error Counters
history_edu Life Stories
mode_comment Comments

The following Counters have been submitted for the above Argument.

error

There was no way Israel could approve the “right of return” Hamas requested

Granting the right of return would have posed significant security concerns for Israeli citizens because it would have led to a mixed Palestinian/Jewish society. Palestinians harbor animosity toward Jews, which would have created constant distress for Israeli residents. Such practical considerations must be taken into account when evaluating Israel's policies.

Submit Story Evaluate Stories

The following Life Stories have been submitted for the above Argument.

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
11:09 PM - 1 Jan 2016

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
11:09 PM - 1 Jan 2016

Submit Comment Evaluate Comments

The following Comments have been submitted for the above Argument.

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
11:09 PM - 1 Jan 2016

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
11:09 PM - 1 Jan 2016

Overview