Does Medicare for All increased or decreased mortality rate in the U.S.?
Topic
turn_right
Decreased
Viewpoint
Does Medicare for All increased or decreased mortality rate in the U.S.?
Topic
turn_right
Decreased
Viewpoint
The following Argument has been submitted for the above Viewpoint.
wb_incandescent
Research has shown that early diagnosis and treatment provided by M4A saves 40,000 to 70,000 lives each year
Hidden During Evaluations Author
0 Counters, 0 Evaluations Total Numbers of Submitted Counters and Counter Evaluations
Ranking Confidence: N/A
During the argument submission period, ranking confidence may experience sudden changes.
Current Confidence in the Ranking of Counters

M4A can lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially saving lives that might be lost under a system where access is dependent on insurance coverage.

A 2009 study estimated that lack of health insurance was associated with 45,000 deaths annually in the U.S. A newer study published in the medical journal The Lancet in 2020 found that Medicare for all would prevent about 68,000 unnecessary deaths per year.

Opponents of M4A argue that a government-run healthcare system could lead to inefficiencies, mismanagement, and lower quality of care, ultimately resulting in higher mortality rates. However, evidence from other countries with universal healthcare systems doesn't support this claim. Notably, these countries spend about half as much per capita on healthcare as the U.S. and get better health outcomes.

Linked References Source Type
No counter has been submitted for the above argument yet.
Submit Story Evaluate Stories
The following Life Stories have been submitted for the above Argument.
Placeholder image

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
Placeholder image
Placeholder image

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
Placeholder image
Submit Comment Evaluate Comments
The following Comments have been submitted for the above Argument.
Placeholder image

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
Placeholder image

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive

Overview