Left to Submit Arguments
Left to Evaluate Arguments
  • The argument Evaluation deadline is typically scheduled some time after the argument Submission deadline to ensure that even late submissions will have an opportunity for evaluation.
  • The list of top arguments is not finalized until the argument Evaluation deadline is reached. (Learn more)
  • Does Medicare for All increased or decreased mortality rate in the U.S.?

    Supporters of Medicare for All (M4A) argue that it will significantly reduce the mortality rate in the U.S., citing the large number of Americans who die from untreated illnesses—one estimate suggests there are 68,000 preventable deaths each year. Conversely, opponents contend that M4A could actually increase the mortality rate beyond current levels due to the inefficiencies often associated with government-run programs. Which perspective is correct?

    Viewpoint 1/2
    Decreased
    Viewpoint

    M4A can lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially saving lives that might be lost under a system where access is dependent on insurance coverage.

    A 2009 study estimated that lack of health insurance was associated with 45,000 deaths annually in the U.S. A newer study published in the medical journal The Lancet in 2020 found that Medicare for all would prevent about 68,000 unnecessary deaths per year.

    Opponents of M4A argue that a government-run healthcare system could lead to inefficiencies, mismanagement, and lower quality of care, ultimately resulting in higher mortality rates. However, evidence from other countries with universal healthcare systems doesn't support this claim. Notably, these countries spend about half as much per capita on healthcare as the U.S. and get better health outcomes.

    refreshLoad More
    {{ (total_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "0" ] - allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "0" ]).toLocaleString() }} more Argument(s) are available
    close_fullscreenMinimize
    Back to the first {{ initially_allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint }} Arguments
    Viewpoint 2/2
    Increased
    Viewpoint

    Government-run programs often face challenges such as bureaucratic inefficiencies, long wait times, and potential mismanagement. These issues could lead to delays in care and a decrease in the quality of services, ultimately harming patients and increasing the mortality rate.

    The current Medicare program, which serves millions of Americans aged 65 and older, has achieved high satisfaction rates among beneficiaries and positive health outcomes. This success indicates that a government-run program can operate efficiently and provide quality care when managed effectively.

    refreshLoad More
    {{ (total_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "1" ] - allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "1" ]).toLocaleString() }} more Argument(s) are available
    close_fullscreenMinimize
    Back to the first {{ initially_allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint }} Arguments