The following Viewpoint has been submitted for the Topic above.
Decrease
The following Arguments have been submitted for the Viewpoint above. For each argument, the top Counter is listed too, if there are any.

M4A can lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially saving lives that might be lost under a system where access is dependent on insurance coverage.

A 2009 study estimated that lack of health insurance was associated with 45,000 deaths annually in the U.S. A newer study published in the medical journal The Lancet in 2020 found that Medicare for all would prevent about 68,000 unnecessary deaths per year.

Opponents of M4A argue that a government-run healthcare system could lead to inefficiencies, mismanagement, and lower quality of care, ultimately resulting in higher mortality rates. However, evidence from other countries with universal healthcare systems doesn't support this claim. Notably, these countries spend about half as much per capita on healthcare as the U.S. and get better health outcomes.


The following Comments have been submitted for the Viewpoint above.
Placeholder image

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive
Placeholder image

John Smith

@johnsmith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus nec iaculis mauris. @bulmaio. #css #responsive

Overview